Ballot Question 3
There are ballot questions awaiting Massachusetts voters in the general election on 8 November. Ballot questions are laws submitted directly to voters for approval, or disapproval, alongside the regular slate of candidates.
Voters will discover four different questions on their ballot:
Question 1: Millionaire’s Tax
Question 2: Regulation of Dental Insurance
Question 3: Expanding Alcohol License Availability
Question 4: Driver’s License for Undocumented Immigrants
Question 3: Expanding Alcohol License Availability
More booze. More places. More awesomeness?
The Secretary of State’s office summarizes the proposed amendment as follows:
This proposed law would increase the statewide limits on the combined number of licenses for the sale of alcoholic beverages for off-premises consumption (including licenses for “all alcoholic beverages” and for “wines and malt beverages”) that any one retailer could own or control: from 9 to 12 licenses in 2023; to 15 licenses in 2027; and to 18 licenses in 2031…
The SoS also passes along the following arguments for and against from proponents and detractors of the proposed amendment.
FOR
Robert Mellion
21st Century Alcohol Retail Reform Committee
A YES vote fulfills consumer desire for expanded convenience in a reasonable and balanced manner that also protects against illegal sales.
A YES vote expands convenience by gradually increasing the total number of alcoholic beverage licenses that any person or company can own. Package stores, convenience stores, supermarkets, superstore retailers, and others will be able to apply for additional licenses for their existing locations that do not currently sell alcohol and for new locations they open.
A YES vote simultaneously enhances public safety and encourages vigilance by retailers through prohibiting self-checkout of alcohol beverages and basing the fine for selling to a minor on a store’s total sales and not just its alcohol sales.
A YES vote also supports state tourism and brings Massachusetts in line with every other state in the country by allowing for valid out of state IDs to be relied upon by alcohol beverage retailers.
HDN Comments:
Consumers want more booze buying options. Businesses want more booze selling options. Why the hell not? That’s the basic argument. The additional clause banning self-checkout of booze is a nice chaser, which allows everyone on the FOR side to pretend this bill is about public safety instead of dollah, dollah bill$ y’all!
AGAINST
Food Stores for Consumer Choice
Our alcohol licensing laws do need serious reforms, but this ballot measure is not the answer. It offers an incomplete solution to a complex problem, doing little to promote competition or expand consumer choice.
Despite some superficially popular provisions designed to entice voters, it fails to lift outdated restrictions on local decision-making, while in fact moving Massachusetts backwards in several significant ways:
imposing unfair penalties against retailers who sell more than just alcohol, like grocers and other food stores;
outlawing convenient and reliable point-of-sale technologies already in widespread use by retailers across the state;
decreasing the number of full liquor licenses that retailers can own.
This flawed approach favors special interests in the alcohol industry, at the expense of cash-strapped consumers and their favorite local retailers.
We deserve more. Vote NO on this question, and instead ask your state lawmakers to support comprehensive legislation that will actually make a difference.
HDN Comments:
The counter argument provided by the AGAINST side is sympathetic to booze law reform, but doesn’t think this bill gets it right. Go back to the drawing board and try again, legislators!
Verdict: Pick ‘Em.
If you’re passionate about having more outlets through which to purchase booze, vote yes. But if you’re dreaming about deeper or different reform in a state that has had a muddled history legislating on booze, then take a pass. Money-wise, there’s not much energy behind the AGAINST side: the Boston Globe list of donors does not include a single AGAINST party.
Stay tuned for more analysis on the remaining ballot questions…
Get on a nickname basis with the Republican candidate for Governor’s Council District 4.
Political novice Rayla Campbell (R) faces a tough challenge to unseat incumbent with long tenure.
How should you vote on the ballot questions this November? HDN provides a round up and analysis of all four questions.
HDN breaks down Ballot Question #4: Driver’s Licenses for Undocumented Immigrants.
Donnie Palmer, the controversial Republican candidate for US House District 7, is a fighter inside and outside the ring.
Who will be the next member of the Governor's Council from District 4?
Who will be our next state representative from the 15th Suffolk District?
Andrew Stern; interview with DIY venue 4th Wall organizers; and more.
A chat with the busking bluesman of Boston & company from the Archives.
A 2009 interview with Great Waves, an indie Americana act out of the Northwest. And a message for Ashley’s dad.
A 2009 interview with post-rock adventurers Caspian before its show at Jugendhaus West, a teen disco on the outskirts of Stuttgart, Germany.
11/3/22. The movers, the shakers, the weirdos, the fakers in Massachusetts politics, sorted.
10/1/22. The political movers, the shakers, the weirdos, the fakers in Massachusetts, sorted.
What sort of violence, greed, lethargy, and moral dissolution went into the production of this record?
Analysis and results of the races that Hump Day News has been tracking in the 2022 MA elections.